original work? Mr. Wang

Are these your original work? Mr. Wang
What's your evidence?

有味道， 但是我也想知道你的研究， 也许我是孤陋寡闻吧， 但我对这方面了解的确实少。

［此帖子已被 wuhumb 在 2004-4-7 23:56:52 编辑过］

hehe, for forum not for libel.

No reference? What's your foundation of your original work?
By the way, what's your major? Maybe you are a genius if you majored in any experimental subject like biological science.
I major in neurobiology.

By the way, please give us your cited references.

What's your meaning?

Maybe you are outdated for absent-minded recent proceeding of visual science.
Please read through Zemir Zeki's classic, A Vision of the Brain (published in 1993), in which you will find something useful for your "original work".
Do you major in ophthalmology?

Zeki's theory of functional specialization supposes that different attributes of the visual scene are processed simultaneously, in parallel, but in anatomically separate parts of the visual cortex. His research of color vision and of motion vision have provided the cornerstones on which the theory of functional specialization in the visual cortex is based.
I think that your 3rd dimension perception means depth vision. We donot really understand whether there is any localization for depth perception in the way that there is for color and for motion.Does depth vision depend upon a disparate input from the two eyes (retina)? The following references may be useful for your study.
Zeki,SM,1978,J Physiol(277):245-72.
Poggio, GF etal,1988,J Neurosci(8):4531-50.
Barlow, HB etal,1967,J Physiol(193):327-42.
Hubel,DH etal,1987,J Neurosci(7):3378-415.
Schiller,P etal,1990,Trends Neurosci(13):392-8.
......

There is a BIG bug in your experiment. Maybe your "three dimension picture" is apriorism but retina neurons' encoded outcome.
Here is a little trial for you. Try to catch precisely the pen put one foot ahead of you when one eye closed. You will find something interesting.
Tell us your result in this trial.

You cannot catch PRECISELY the pen put one foot ahead of you when one eye closed. This phenomenon indicates that depth vision isn't derived from ONLY one eye.
This is a common experiment in psychology.
I am disappointed for your reply even I believed that many puzzles are to be answered. You know, there lies novel theory in visual perception to be built instead of the traditional ones. But, the most important, I need the solid and sexy evidence to support the theory.
Byebye.